Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 73 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use signature and . The mass here is the asymptotic rest-frame Arnowitt-Deser-Misner energy; it is useful to prove the stronger energy-momentum inequality. Interpret asymptotic flatness with its usual differentiable falloff, for example , , and extrinsic curvature , with the additional decay/integrability needed for the charges and integrations below. The complete nonsingular slice has no inner boundary. An oriented three-dimensional slice admits a spin structure. If there are several asymptotically flat ends, prescribe a constant spinor at the end whose mass is being measured and zero constants at the other ends.
Let be the future unit normal and write for the restricted spacetime spin connection. This is the Sen spinor connection, not merely the intrinsic connection :Omitting this term on a general slice would omit the ADM momentum. Choose anti-Hermitian, the spatial gamma matrices Hermitian, and . The commuting-spinor Dirac current is future causal and .
The Nester two-form supplies the needed integration identity. DefineHere multiple gamma indices denote antisymmetrized products. To derive the identity, differentiate , use , and antisymmetrize the two derivatives in the terms containing . Their commutator is the spinor curvature identityExpansion of the gamma products and the first Bianchi identity reduce this curvature contribution to an Einstein tensor contraction. It vanishes for the Vacuum Einstein equations. At a point in a normal-adapted orthonormal frame the remaining contraction isbecause . The normal-projection connection terms combine with the Einstein constraints. Thus, in vacuum, the Witten-Nester identity isAll norms here use the positive spinor norm on the spacelike slice. This derivation explains both the negative Dirac square and the condition needed to remove it.
Solve the Witten spinor equation with . The existence step is part of the argument. Extend the desired constant smoothly from infinity to a spinor and seek a decaying correction satisfying . The principal symbol squares to , so this is an elliptic differential operator. On the asymptotically flat ends, the Euclidean Dirac estimate and the weighted estimate from Hardy's inequality control the decaying correction; on a compact interior the usual elliptic estimate applies. Together these give the weighted Fredholm estimate for a decay weight between the constant and homogeneous Euclidean modes. A decaying homogeneous solution has zero boundary flux, so the integrated identity forces ; its zero limit at infinity forces . The formal adjoint has the same obstruction: with the conventions above is formally skew-adjoint. Consequently the decaying kernel and cokernel vanish, and the Fredholm alternative gives the required correction. Completeness and absence of an inner boundary are essential to this argument. This is the elliptic existence of a Witten spinor, rather than an assumption that an arbitrary prescribed spinor solves the equation.
For completeness, identify the asymptotic flux. Expanding the intrinsic spin connection in an asymptotically Cartesian orthonormal frame givesThe derivative of the decaying spinor correction has zero linear flux by antisymmetry of its gamma-matrix coefficient; quadratic correction terms decay away. Since the ADM energy and momentum have the respective and surface normalizations, the ADM boundary term of the Nester two-form isApply the divergence theorem to the complete slice and use . There is no inner flux to discard:Asymptotic constant spinors can be chosen with a future null current in any specified spatial direction. Choosing the direction of yieldsIn particular, the rest-frame mass is nonnegative. This proves the positive energy theorem in the vacuum setting rather than applying it as an unexplained bound.
If this mass is zero, then in the asymptotic rest frame and the inequality gives . The same identity with any nonzero has zero right-hand side. Smoothness then makes its integrand vanish pointwise:The spinor is nonzero, since it has nonzero asymptotic value. This is a spinor parallel along ; no time-parallel condition has yet been inferred merely from the integral.
For the static conclusion, it is possible to avoid assuming that the given slice was already orthogonal to the static Killing field. Because , repeat the zero-energy construction for four linearly independent asymptotic Dirac spinors. Parallel transport by the Sen spinor connection is invertible, so the resulting spinors form a basis everywhere on . Tangential curvature annihilates each of them:Thus as an operator. The six antisymmetric gamma products give a faithful Spinor representation of the Lorentz group, so for tangential . In a normal-adapted orthonormal frame this already kills the purely spatial and magnetic curvature components. The remaining components vanish by the Vacuum Einstein equations:Consequently the full spacetime Riemann curvature tensor vanishes on .
A static Killing vector field generates isometries and preserves this curvature. Its flow from the slice therefore propagates the vanishing curvature throughout the connected static development. Extend one of the spinors by spacetime parallel transport along these time orbits, so that . In coordinates propagated along the orbits, the spatial and temporal coordinate vector fields commute. Zero spin curvature then givesThe initial tangential derivative is zero, so it stays zero. This constructs the required nonzero spacetime parallel spinor; the initial parallel frame also removes any spin-holonomy ambiguity inherited from loops in . The static zero-energy parallel-spinor rigidity conclusion isAn equivalent check in a regular orthogonal static slicing is to write . The slice has zero extrinsic curvature. An intrinsic parallel spinor forces the spatial Ricci tensor to vanish by contracting its spin-curvature identity and using the invertibility of Clifford multiplication by a nonzero real vector. By three-dimensional curvature from the Ricci tensor, is flat. The static vacuum equation then makes the lapse gradient parallel, and asymptotic normalization forces . The temporal spin connection vanishes as well.
An explicit example is Minkowski spacetime, , where every constant spinor in a Cartesian tetrad is a spacetime parallel spinor and the ADM mass is zero. A singular inner boundary cannot be silently allowed in the proof: it would add a boundary term to the positive-energy identity.