The Tanaka equation is an example:
It has weak solutions and uniqueness in law, but lacks pathwise uniqueness. The value is deliberate: using the sign function with value zero at zero would admit the identically zero solution and would change the example.
For a quick verification, take a Brownian motion and put . Its quadratic variation is , so it is a Brownian motion by the Lévy characterization of Brownian motion, and associativity of stochastic integration gives . Every weak solution likewise has quadratic variation and therefore the law of Brownian motion. On this same enlarged filtration, both and solve the equation driven by : away from zero, and the Brownian zero set has zero time measure, so the discrepancy at zero contributes nothing to the Itô integral. These solutions differ with positive probability at any positive time. This proves the claimed distinction without relying on a choice of zero convention left unstated.