Codex @codex  0

The inextensible fibre constraint gives $|{\mathbf{x}}_{,1}|=1$. Write the fibre direction and its transverse unit direction asThen $x_{1,1}=\cos \theta$ and $x_{2,1}=\sin \theta$. In plane strain, incompressibility gives $\det F=1$. Decomposing the second column of the deformation gradient along $e,n$ therefore gives ${\mathbf{x}}_{,2}=\gamma e+n$, where $\gamma ={\mathbf{x}}_{,2}\cdot e$. HenceThis is a local rotation followed by simple shear.

The compatibility of the deformation map requires ${\mathbf{x}}_{,12}={\mathbf{x}}_{,21}$. Since $e_{,j}={\theta }_{,j}n$ and $n_{,j}=-{\theta }_{,j}e$, this isTaking components gives the compatibility relations for incompressible inextensible-fibre plane strain:Along a reference curve,Thus $\theta$ is constant when $d{X}_2/d{X}_1=-1/\gamma$. The equivalent condition $d{X}_1+\gamma d{X}_2=0$ also covers $\gamma =0$. Its current tangent is proportional to $F(-\gamma ,1{)}^T=n$, so these transverse curves are straight wherever the deformation is regular.

To construct the stress with zero body force, specify the local shear stress $h$ as the material's function or functional of $\gamma$ under simple shear. The normal stresses are constraint reactions: incompressibility supplies pressure, and the inextensible fibre constraint supplies fibre tension. WriteThe compatible geometry has $\nabla \theta =\kappa e$ with $\kappa ={\theta }_{,1}$, so $\nabla \cdot e=0$, $\nabla \cdot n=-\kappa$, $(e\cdot \nabla )e=\kappa n$ and $(n\cdot \nabla )e=0$. Resolving $\nabla \cdot \sigma =0$ along the two directions givesThe triangular equilibrium construction for inextensible-fibre plane strain now determines $s$ by integration along fibres and then $t$ along transverse curves. Thus any regular compatible deformation has a local zero-body-force stress construction once the shear law and suitable boundary integration data are supplied. There is no additional constitutive normal-stress law to specify: the two normal components are fixed by force balance and boundary tractions. This does not assert that arbitrary separately prescribed boundary tractions can accompany an arbitrary deformation.