Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 28 4 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The multiplicative Hilbert theorem 90 states that, for a finite Galois extension with Galois group , every multiplicative cocycle satisfying has the form for some . In the cyclic case , it says
Here is the full existence argument. Distinct field homomorphisms are linearly independent as functions over . To see this Artin independence theorem directly, assume a nonzero identically vanishing relation with the fewest nonzero coefficients. There are at least two terms. Choose two participating embeddings and an element with . Evaluate the relation at and subtract times its value at . The th term disappears while the first remains nonzero, giving a shorter vanishing relation, a contradiction.
Apply this independence toThe coefficients are nonzero, so is not identically zero; choose with . The cocycle identity gives , and henceThis proves the general statement. In the cyclic case, given , set and for . The norm-one identity makes this definition compatible with , and the cocycle identity follows by concatenating the products. The argument above gives . Conversely that quotient has norm one because its conjugate product telescopes.
Finally let be unramified, and take its arithmetic Frobenius . For a unit of norm one, the cyclic theorem gives with . Write and choose the common uniformizer . Then has valuation zero, and implies . Thus the unit form of Hilbert theorem 90 isThe unramified hypothesis is what permits shifting an arbitrary integer valuation of by a power of a uniformizer belonging to .