Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 72 1 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The physical angle takes values on a circle, so it is defined modulo . Around a closed curve enclosing a phase vortex,The integer winding number cannot change through a smooth single-valued deformation unless a defect crosses the curve. Thus a globally smooth Gaussian spin wave field omits whole topological sectors of the XY model.
Outside a vortex core of radius , an isolated charge- phase vortex has and . Its dimensionless energy in a sample of size isThere are of order positions for its core, so the positional entropy contributes . The competition for unit charge is therefore , apart from core terms. Opposite charges have a logarithmic attraction and form a vortex Coulomb gas.
At low temperature, vortex-antivortex binding leaves no free charges on large scales. Spin waves still destroy true long-range order, but the correlation function decays algebraically with the renormalized phase stiffness. At the Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition, pairs unbind; free vortices screen the interaction and produce a finite correlation length and exponential decay above the transition. The energy-entropy estimate identifies the threshold stiffness , where is the long-distance dimensionless stiffness, not necessarily the bare . It agrees with the universal stiffness jump and the limiting algebraic exponent . The two-dimensional transition is vortex unbinding between quasi-long-range order and disorder, rather than the onset of nonzero spontaneous magnetization.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 69 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition is a defect-unbinding transition of a two-dimensional system with a compact continuous phase, such as the short-range XY model. At long wavelengths, smooth spin waves have energywhere is the phase stiffness. Gaussian averaging givesThus smooth fluctuations already destroy true nonzero magnetization in an infinite two-dimensional system, in accordance with the Mermin-Wagner theorem. The low-temperature phase instead has quasi-long-range order, with algebraically decaying correlations. The stiffness in its asymptotic exponent is the renormalized long-distance stiffness, not merely the microscopic coupling.
The phase is periodic modulo , so it also permits topological defects with integer winding . A phase vortex has , and integration givesA singly charged phase vortex can be placed in roughly locations, giving entropy . This energy-entropy balance suggests that isolated vortices become favorable when the effective stiffness falls to . Below the transition, vortex-antivortex binding predominates; above it their unbinding screens the logarithmic interaction and produces a finite correlation length. A single-vortex estimate identifies the mechanism but does not include screening by smaller pairs.
The dilute-vortex vortex-pair renormalization flow incorporates this screening. With and dimensionless core fugacity , one conventional leading-order normalization givesThe first equation says polarizable phase vortex pairs reduce stiffness. The second compares the phase vortex's position scaling dimension two with its logarithmic energy cost . Numerical coefficients in depend on its definition, but the zero-fugacity threshold is invariant. For , sufficiently small fugacity flows to zero, leaving a line of Gaussian spin-wave renormalization-group fixed points with varying algebraic exponent. On the other side of the separatrix, fugacity grows and the dilute approximation eventually ceases to apply.
Near the endpoint set and . To leading order and , so is invariant. The critical separatrix approaches . Just on the disordered side this invariant is , proportional to the reduced temperature deviation for a generic path through the transition. Hence , whose integration gives a time in logarithmic scale of order . Stopping when the fugacity becomes order one yieldswith nonuniversal . This derives the essential singularity and explains why assigning a finite ordinary correlation-length exponent is inappropriate.
At the transition the limiting stiffness from below has the universal stiffness jumpAbove , the thermodynamic long-distance stiffness vanishes and correlations decay exponentially. The singular free-energy contribution is of order and is exponentially small in , so this infinite-order transition is unlike a Landau transition with a discontinuous order parameter or an ordinary power-law heat-capacity singularity. The renormalization mechanism is developed in Kosterlitz's original vortex analysis. The transition separates bound vortices and algebraic order from unbound vortices and short-range order, while neither finite-temperature phase has conventional spontaneous XY magnetization.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 303 3 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Assume for stability. With equal quadratic coefficients and , the internal symmetry is the full orthogonal group . In two dimensions at positive temperature, with short-range interactions, the Mermin-Wagner theorem forbids spontaneous symmetry breaking of this continuous symmetry. Thus in both phases in the infinite system; a nonzero average order parameter does not distinguish them.
Instead measure the correlation functionThe low-temperature phase has quasi-long-range order and algebraic correlations; the high-temperature phase has a finite correlation length and exponential correlations. More precisely,A finite order parameter amplitude allows . Its long-distance Goldstone-mode effective free energy is . Restoring the Boltzmann constant and using the renormalized phase stiffness, the thermal phase fluctuations giveThe Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition separates vortex-antivortex binding from unbound vortex defects. At the boundary, the universal stiffness jump gives and . The low-temperature phase stiffness is nonzero; it vanishes at long distances in the disordered phase. The exact transition location is fluctuation dependent and cannot be obtained just by setting the bare to zero.
Single-vortex energy-entropy balance 2026-10-18
Consider an original counting example: a square two-dimensional XY model of side , a microscopic core radius , and a fixed phase stiffness . This deliberately neglects screening by other vortices. Away from a unit phase vortex, and . Integrating the Goldstone-mode effective free energy over an annulus givesBoundary shape changes finite terms. There are order core positions, so the positional entropy is , where is the Boltzmann constant. With , subtracting gives the displayed free energy.
For and , the dimensionless free energy cost is about at and at . The same logarithm appears in the cost and the positional reward: increasing the system size strengthens whichever has the larger coefficient. The corresponding one-defect Boltzmann factors, about and , are relative statistical weights, not normalized probabilities. The latter signals failure of a dilute single-defect estimate.
A single net phase vortex requires compatible boundaries: on a periodic sample use neutral pairs, as required by vortex charge neutrality. This argument identifies a possible threshold, but predicting the universal stiffness jump requires the renormalized phase stiffness, after smaller pairs have responded. It does not justify setting the transition temperature equal to a bare lattice coupling divided by a universal constant.
In 2006, Zoran Hadzibabic, Peter Krüger, Marc Cheneau, Baptiste Battelier and Jean Dalibard split a cooled rubidium-87 cloud into two independent planar gases using an optical lattice. After release, the expanding sheets overlapped; absorption imaging recorded their matter-wave interference. Smooth fringe waviness revealed thermal phase fluctuations, while sharp dislocations indicated isolated vortices. The initial evaporative-cooling endpoint controlled the preparation; central fringe contrast served as a degeneracy proxy because direct thermometry in the lattice was difficult.[ref]
Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless Crossover in a Trapped Atomic Gas by Zoran Hadzibabic and others. Pages 1–2, preparation and readout; Fig. 1; temperature control and Fig. 2
Loss of extended coherence coincided with increased vortex signatures. The optical trap and finite cloud produced a crossover; tightly bound pairs were unresolved, and short-wavelength modes could contaminate high-temperature counts. These were observations of the vortex-unbinding mechanism, not a direct measurement of phase stiffness or a sharp homogeneous universal stiffness jump. The authors left the sample's superfluidity open.[ref]
Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless Crossover in a Trapped Atomic Gas by Zoran Hadzibabic and others. Pages 3–4, Figs. 3–4; geometry, invisible pairs, detection limits and final paragraph on unmeasured superfluidity