Choose the time dependence and measure distances in background-wavenumber units. Thus , the incident field satisfies , and the scattering potential convention is , giving . To match the minus sign in the paper's integral, take the outgoing Green function to satisfy . This is the negative of the frequently used outgoing Helmholtz equation fundamental solution satisfying . In physical coordinates one restores in the scattering potential, or absorbs it in the integral kernel; the sign convention must remain consistent.
On a region where the incident and total fields are nonzero, introduce the logarithmic wave perturbation
Choose a continuous logarithm branch connected to the unperturbed field. Substitution into the Helmholtz equation gives
The quadratic term uses the complex bilinear dot product, not the squared modulus of the gradient. Write and . The first-order Rytov approximation discards that quadratic term. Since , the outgoing first correction is
and hence
The validity of the first Rytov approximation concerns the omitted logarithmic correction. Its next contribution satisfies , so a useful explicit criterion is that the outgoing solution be small in the region of interest. Weak refractive index contrast and small wave phase gradients on a wavelength scale provide the usual perturbative regime, with weak amplitude fluctuations and no strong focusing or zeros that destroy the logarithm. A sufficient local source comparison is where the scattering potential is nonzero, together with control of propagation of that error. This is not a universal pointwise test at zeros of .
Small accumulated wave phase is not required in the same way as in a linear field approximation: the exponential retains that wave phase accumulation. Large gradients, strong multiple-scattering amplitude effects or field zeros can still invalidate the Rytov approximation. The integrals also require a finite scattering region or appropriate convergence conditions.