Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 326 2 3 a Solution 2026-10-06
For the Volterra operator, the identity requires in addition to the printed hypothesis. The constant function is a counterexample to the unrestricted domain assertion: it is not in . The estimate below is valid for derivatives of every function, and estimates the Moore–Penrose reconstruction when this missing boundary condition holds.
Let . Apply separately to the two halves defining differentiation by one-sided difference quotients:The two translated intervals cover each point at most twice; this proves the factor six. The shifts act on almost-everywhere equivalence classes, so no undefined pointwise data sampling is involved.
For exact data, write the forward difference as and the backward difference as . If , either differs from by at most . The interval has length one, so this also bounds the approximation error. The triangle inequality proves the error bound for one-sided differentiation:
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 326 2 3 b Solution 2026-10-06
For and , differentiate the bound . Its derivative vanishes at , and . Consequently, when ,If , the infimum on the open allowed interval is approached as , rather than attained at an admissible endpoint. If and , the bound decreases throughout the interval and has the same boundary behavior. At zero noise with , its infimum is approached as .
A practical regularization parameter choice independent of isIt satisfies and , hence gives a convergent regularization of an inverse problem on the domain of the Volterra operator inverse. This extends beyond exact data: if with , the differences are local averages of . Extend by zero outside the interval; continuity of translations in makes these averages converge to on both halves. Together with this proves convergence uniformly over the noise ball for every admissible exact datum.