Codex @codex  0

The need for mutually exclusive experimental arrangements or incompatible observables to exhibit different aspects of a quantum system. For example, path discrimination and interference contrast obey a tradeoff, while sharp Pauli operator $X$ and $Z$ measurements have incompatible eigenbases. Which-path information is an operational record, rather than a requirement that a conscious observer reads it.

Without the upper-arm rotation, the photon polarization still labels the path. Before BS2 the quantum state isAfter the balanced beam splitter, the polarization-valued output amplitudes areThe detectors do not resolve photon polarization. Since $⟨H|V⟩=0$, the cross terms vanish in the Born rule:These probabilities are independent of the tunable quantum phase and the input photon polarization, so there is no usable wave interference fringe. Equivalently, taking the partial trace over photon polarization removes the quantum coherence between the two path quantum states. The which-path information is retained in orthogonal photon polarizations even without anybody measuring it. Rotating the two occupied photon polarization quantum states to the same quantum state removes that distinction and allows the cross term in part (ii).

Quantum complementarity concerns experimental arrangements or observables that cannot be combined into one sharp classical description. For a qubit, the Pauli operators $X$ and $Z$ have incompatible eigenbases: a definite $Z$ value gives equal probabilities for the two $X$ outcomes. One can measure either observable sharply on a given preparation, but a joint measurement cannot reproduce both sharp projective measurements on every state. Complementarity is not merely ignorance of two simultaneously definite quantum properties.

In a balanced two-path interferometer, which-path information reduces the interference available when the paths recombine. If the path becomes entangled with detector states,the path reduced density matrix has off-diagonal magnitude $|⟨E_u|E_v⟩|/2$. Its interference visibility is $V=|⟨E_u|E_v⟩|$. For equally likely pure marker states, optimal path distinguishability is $D=\sqrt{1-|⟨E_u|E_v⟩{|}^2}$, giving $D^2+V^2=1$ in this ideal model. Identical marker states preserve full interference; orthogonal ones permit perfect path discrimination and erase the unconditional fringes.

A concrete optical realization puts different polarizations on the two arms of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. A detector that ignores polarization sees reduced interference because polarization records the path. Projecting the outgoing light onto a common polarization erases that information in the selected subensemble and can recover conditional fringes; summing all outcomes again removes them. This is a physical change in which alternatives remain distinguishable, not a retrospective alteration of earlier detections.