Azimuthal quantum number

I can't believe you got such a basic fact wrong!

1+1<svg width='400em' height='1.08em' viewBox='0 0 400000 1080' preserveAspectRatio='xMinYMin slice'><path d='M95,702
c-2.7,0,-7.17,-2.7,-13.5,-8c-5.8,-5.3,-9.5,-10,-9.5,-14
c0,-2,0.3,-3.3,1,-4c1.3,-2.7,23.83,-20.7,67.5,-54
c44.2,-33.3,65.8,-50.3,66.5,-51c1.3,-1.3,3,-2,5,-2c4.7,0,8.7,3.3,12,10
s173,378,173,378c0.7,0,35.3,-71,104,-213c68.7,-142,137.5,-285,206.5,-429
c69,-144,104.5,-217.7,106.5,-221
l0 -0
c5.3,-9.3,12,-14,20,-14
H400000v40H845.2724
s-225.272,467,-225.272,467s-235,486,-235,486c-2.7,4.7,-9,7,-19,7
c-6,0,-10,-1,-12,-3s-194,-422,-194,-422s-65,47,-65,47z
M834 80h400000v40h-400000z'/></svg>​=3, not 2 as mentioned

$\sqrt{1 + 1} = 3$, not 2 as mentioned

The fundamental theorem of calculus is very important to understanding this subject.

I would add something like:
\Q[
The reason why the superconductor laser is blue, is due to the integral of its resonance modes.

From the fundamental theorem of calculus, we understand that this is because the derivative of the temperature is too small.
]

== Also mentions Newton's rule

As an added bonus, a mention of Newton's rule would also be very useful.


Add mention of the fundamental theorem of calculus

There's a typo in this article at "mathmatcs"

This is a section about Azimuthal quantum number!

Azimuthal quantum number is a very important subject about which there is a lot to say.

For example, this sentence. And then another one.


 Discussion on "Azimuthal quantum number" by Donald Trump (@donald-trump, 29)

My test comment

My test comment 2

My test comment 3

Test child

Why I think you are stupid

I don't think this is correct.

My test comment

My test comment 2

My test comment 3

Test child