Eukaryotic ribosome Updated 2025-07-16
Gaupol Updated 2025-07-16
Good shortcuts and user experience.
No waveform viewer: github.com/otsaloma/gaupol/issues/49 so unusable.
Mass renormalization Updated 2025-07-16
Modular trapped ion quantum computer Updated 2025-07-16
Trapped ion people acknowledge that they can't put a million qubits in on chip (TODO why) so they are already thinking of ways to entangle separate chips. Thinking is maybe the key word here. One of the propoesd approaches inolves optical links. Universal Quantum for example explicitly rejects that idea in favor of electric field link modularity.
Oak Ridge supercomputer Updated 2025-07-16
Orbital approximation Updated 2025-07-16
Raspberry Pi 1 Updated 2025-07-16
Saint Peter Updated 2025-07-16
Brother of andrew the Apostle, called by Jesus in fishers of men. Born Simon, but Jesus renamed him to Peter, thus the weird "Simon called Peter" way he is referred to as in some versions of the Bible.
Sandy Lerner nude photo Updated 2025-07-16
She posed naked on horseback for Forbes to promote animal rights in 1997.
A ultra low resolution reproduction of the image can be found at: rohitnair.wordpress.com/2011/12/13/cisco-history-cisco-systems-history-and-trivia-brand-history-and-trivia/
Sequoia Capital Updated 2025-07-16
Term symbols for carbon ground state Updated 2025-07-16
Carbon has electronic structure 1s2 2s2 2p2.
For term symbols we only care about unfilled layers, because in every filled layer the total z angular momentum is 0, as one electron necessarily cancels out each other:
- magnetic quantum number varies from -l to +l, each with z angular momentum to and so each cancels the other out
- spin quantum number is either + or minus half, and so each pair of electron cancels the other out
So in this case, we only care about the 2 electrons in 2p2. Let's list out all possible ways in which the 2p2 electrons can be.
There are 3 p orbitals, with three different magnetic quantum numbers, each representing a different possible z quantum angular momentum.
We are going to distribute 2 electrons with 2 different spins across them. All the possible distributions that don't violate the Pauli exclusion principle are:
m_l +1 0 -1 m_L m_S
u_ u_ __ 1 1
u_ __ u_ 0 1
__ u_ u_ -1 1
d_ d_ __ 1 -1
d_ __ d_ 0 -1
__ d_ d_ -1 -1
u_ d_ __ 1 0
d_ u_ __ 1 0
u_ __ d_ 0 0
d_ __ u_ 0 0
__ u_ d_ -1 0
__ d_ u_ -1 0
ud __ __ 2 0
__ ud __ 0 0
__ __ ud -2 0where:
m_lis , the magnetic quantum number of each electron. Remember that this gives a orbital (non-spin) quantum angular momentum of to each such electronm_Lwith a capital L is the sum of the of each electronm_Swith a capital S is the sum of the spin angular momentum of each electron
For example, on the first line:we have:and so the sum of them has angular momentum . So the value of is 1, we just omit the .
m_l +1 0 -1 m_L m_S
u_ u_ __ 1 1- one electron with , and so angular momentum
- one electron with , and so angular momentum 0
TODO now I don't understand the logic behind the next steps... I understand how to mechanically do them, but what do they mean? Can you determine the term symbol for individual microstates at all? Or do you have to group them to get the answer? Since there are multiple choices in some steps, it appears that you can't assign a specific term symbol to an individual microstate. And it has something to do with the Slater determinant. The previous lecture mentions it: www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_8n1TS-8Y0 more precisely youtu.be/7_8n1TS-8Y0?t=2268 about carbon.
youtu.be/DAgEmLWpYjs?t=2675 mentions that is not allowed because it would imply , which would be a state
uu __ __ which violates the Pauli exclusion principle, and so was not listed on our list of 15 states.He then goes for and mentions:and so that corresponds to states on our list:Note that for some we had a two choices, so we just pick any one of them and tick them off off from the table, which now looks like:
ud __ __ 2 0
u_ d_ __ 1 0
u_ __ d_ 0 0
__ u_ d_ -1 0
__ __ ud -2 0 +1 0 -1 m_L m_S
u_ u_ __ 1 1
u_ __ u_ 0 1
__ u_ u_ -1 1
d_ d_ __ 1 -1
d_ __ d_ 0 -1
__ d_ d_ -1 -1
d_ u_ __ 1 0
d_ __ u_ 0 0
__ d_ u_ -1 0
__ ud __ 0 0Then for the choices are:so we have 9 possibilities for both together. We again verify that 9 such states are left matching those criteria, and tick them off, and so on.
Exchange-traded fund Updated 2025-07-16
nodejs/sequelize/raw/parallel_update_async.js Updated 2025-07-16
../../../nodejs/sequelize/raw/parallel_update_worker_threads.js contains a base example that can be used to test what can happen when queries are being run in parallel. But it is broken due to a
sqlite3 Node.js package bug: github.com/mapbox/node-sqlite3/issues/1381...../../../nodejs/sequelize/raw/parallel_update_async.js is an
async version of it. It should be just parallel enough to allow observing the same effects.This is an example of a transaction where the SQL READ COMMITTED isolation level if sufficient.
These examples run queries of type:
UPDATE "MyInt" SET i = i + 1Sample execution:which does:
node --unhandled-rejections=strict ./parallel_update_async.js p 10 100- PostgreSQL, see other databases options at SQL example
- 10 threads
- 100 increments on each thread
The fear then is that of a classic read-modify-write failure.
But as www.postgresql.org/docs/14/transaction-iso.html page makes very clear, including with an explicit example of type
UPDATE accounts SET balance = balance + 100.00 WHERE acctnum = 12345;, that the default isolation level, SQL READ COMMITTED isolation level, already prevents any problems with this, as the update always re-reads selected rows in case they were previously modified.Since in PostgreSQL "Read uncommitted" appears to be effectively the same as "Read committed", we won't be able to observe any failures on that database system for this example.
nodejs/sequelize/raw/parallel_create_delete_empty_tag.js contains an example where things can actually blow up in read committed.
Initial public offering Updated 2025-07-16
Isomorphic JavaScript Updated 2025-07-16
Prokaryotic ribosome Updated 2025-07-16
Romantic Warrior by Return to Forever (1976) Updated 2025-07-16
Special unitary of degree 2 Updated 2025-07-16
Spontaneous emission defies causality Updated 2025-07-16
TODO understand better, mentioned e.g. at Subtle is the Lord by Abraham Pais (1982) page 20, and is something that Einstein worked on.
Stanford University alumnus Updated 2025-07-16
Unlisted articles are being shown, click here to show only listed articles.