IBM Updated 2025-07-16
Mathieu group Updated 2025-07-16
Politician Updated 2025-07-16
Software development method Updated 2025-07-16
Software license Updated 2025-07-16
Lie derivative Updated 2025-07-16
Maya (religion) Updated 2025-07-16
Measurement-based quantum computer Updated 2025-07-16
Mechanical resonance Updated 2025-07-16
Rabi cycle Updated 2025-07-16
User interface Updated 2025-07-16
For computer interfaces see: computer user-interface.
Chemical weapon Updated 2025-07-16
Mechanics vendor Updated 2025-07-16
Quantum volume Updated 2025-07-16
Republican Party (United States) Updated 2025-07-16
Scanning tunnelling microscope Updated 2025-07-16
It sees and moves individual atoms!!!
Why phosphorus has multiple valencies? Updated 2025-07-16
TCP/IP Updated 2025-07-16
Lagrangian vs Hamiltonian Updated 2025-07-16
The key difference from Lagrangian mechanics is that the Hamiltonian approach groups variables into pairs of coordinates called the phase space coordinates:This leads to having two times more unknown functions than in the Lagrangian. However, it also leads to a system of partial differential equations with only first order derivatives, which is nicer. Notably, it can be more clearly seen in phase space.
- generalized coordinates, generally positions or angles
- their corresponding conjugate momenta, generally velocities, or angular velocities
Length contraction Updated 2025-07-16
Suppose that a rod has is length measured on a rest frame (or maybe even better: two identical rulers were manufactured, and one is taken on a spaceship, a bit like the twin paradox).
Question: what is the length than an observer in frame moving relative to as speed observe the rod to be?
The key idea is that there are two events to consider in each frame, which we call 1 and 2:Note that what you visually observe on a photograph is a different measurement to the more precise/easy to calculate two event measurement. On a photograph, it seems you might not even see the contraction in some cases as mentioned at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrell_rotation
- the left end of the rod is an observation event at a given position at a given time: and for or and for
- the right end of the rod is an observation event at a given position at a given time : and for or and for
By plugging those values into the Lorentz transformation, we can eliminate , and conclude that for any , the length contraction relation holds:
The key question that needs intuitive clarification then is: but how can this be symmetric? How can both observers see each other's rulers shrink?
And the key answer is: because to the second observer, the measurements made by the first observer are not simultaneous. Notably, the two measurement events are obviously spacelike-separated events by looking at the light cone, and therefore can be measured even in different orders by different observers.
Unlisted articles are being shown, click here to show only listed articles.