Incoming links: Semantic triple
Intro/docs: www.jonmsterling.com/jms-005P.xml. It is very hard to find information in that system however, largely because they don't seem to have a proper recursive cross file table of contents.
This is the project with the closest philosophy to OurBigBook that Ciro Santilli has ever found. It just tends to be even more idealistic than, OurBigBook in general, which is insane!
Source code: sr.ht/~jonsterling/forester. Not on GitHub, too much idealism for that.
"Docs" at: www.jonmsterling.com/foreign-forester-jms-005P.xml Sample repo at: github.com/jonsterling/forest but all parts of interest are in submodules on the authors private Git server.
Example:
- sample source file: git.sr.ht/~jonsterling/public-trees/tree/2356f52303c588fadc2136ffaa168e9e5fbe346c/item/jms-005P.tree
- appears rendered at: www.jonmsterling.com/foreign-forester-jms-005P.xml
Author's main social media account seems to be: mathstodon.xyz/@jonmsterling e.g. mathstodon.xyz/@jonmsterling/111359099228291730 His home page:
They have
\Include like OurBigBook, nice: www.jonmsterling.com/jms-007L.xml, but OMG that name \transclude{xxx-NNNN}!! It seems to be possible to have human readable IDs too if you want: www.jonmsterling.com/foreign-forester-armaëlguéneau.xml is under trees/public/roladex/armaëlguéneau.tree.Headers have open/close:OurBigBook considered this, but went with
\subtree[jms-00YG]{}parent= instead finally to avoid huge lists of close parenthesis at the end of deep nodes.One really cool thing is that the headers render internal links as clickable, which brings it all closer to the "knowledge base as a formal ontology" approach.
Does not encourage human readable IDs, uses stuff like
jms-00YG.The markup has relatively few insane constructs, notably you need explicit open paragraphs everywhere The markup is documented at: www.jonmsterling.com/foreign-forester-jms-007N.xml
\p{}?! OMG, too idealistic, not enough pragmatism. There are however a few insane constructs:[](): markdown like links[[bluecat]]: wikilinks (but to raw IDs only, you can't seem to be able to do[[blue cat]]#{}and##{}for inline and block maths, though that might just be a sane construct with an insane name
Jon has some very good theory of personal knowledge base, rationalizing several points that Ciro Santilli had in his mind but hadn't fully put into words, which is quite cool.
OCaml dependency is not so bad, but it relies on actually LaTeX for maths, which is bad. Maybe using JavaScript for OurBigBook wasn't such a bad choice after all, KaTeX just works.
Viewing the generated output HTML directly requires
security.fileuri.strict_origin_policy which is sad, but using a local server solves it. So it appears to actually pull pieces together with JavaScript? Also output files have .xml extension, the idealism! They are reconsidering that though: www.jonmsterling.com/foreign-forester-jms-005P.xml#tree-8720.The Ctrl+K article dropdown search navigation is quite cool.
\rel and \meta allows for arbitrary ontologies between nodes as semantic triples. But they suffer from one fatal flaw: the relations are headers in themselves. We often want to explain why a relation is true, give intuition to it, and refer to it from other nodes. This is obviously how the brain works: relations are nodes just like objects.They do appear to be putting full trees on every toplevel regardless how deep and with JavaScript turned off e.g.:
which is cool but will take lots of storage. In OurBigBook Ciro Santilli only does that on OurBigBook Web where each page can be dynamically generated.