Apparent power is the product of RMS terminal electric potential difference and electric current, conventionally expressed in volt-amperes:For sinusoidal signals at one frequency, it equals the magnitude of complex electrical power and satisfies . It is not generally the average rate of net energy absorption, which is active power.[ref]
AC Power Flow in Linear Networks by James L. Kirtley Jr.. Energy and Power, equations61–63 and §7.1, apparent/complex power and RMS convention
For an original example, a100V terminal pair carrying5A RMS has500VA of apparent power. If active power is400W, the power factor is0.8. In the sinusoidal case the magnitude of reactive power is reactive volt-amperes; the magnitude calculation alone does not determine whether the current leads or lags.
Magnitudes do not add like complex quantities. Consider two parallel sinusoidal loads at the same supply, with complex powers and in volt-amperes. Each has500VA of apparent power, but the combined terminal complex power is600VA with zero imaginary part. The source therefore sees600VA rather than the1000VA sum of individual magnitudes. Their internal branch currents and individual component requirements still exist; reactive cancellation at the source does not erase those branch conditions.
For nonsinusoidal waveforms, the product definition remains useful, but the simple equality with the magnitude of one fundamental-frequency complex power needs qualification. With and , RMS current is5A and apparent power is500VA. The fundamental-frequency complex electrical power is only300VA. The extra RMS current is not represented by that one complex number.
Thus record the waveform convention with an apparent power rating or measurement. Separately measuring RMS potential difference and current gives this product, while recovering active power requires the corresponding average product or adequate phase-resolved information. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality guarantees without assuming a sinusoidal waveform.
New to topics? Read the docs here!