 Bearing thermal end-stop load

A bearing thermal end-stop load is the axial reaction that appears when relative thermal expansion exhausts the free travel of a support arrangement. In a quasistatic one-direction model, let free thermal mismatch be ${\delta }_{\mathrm{th}}$, initial travel to the stop be $g$, shaft compliance be $C_b$ and restraining support compliance be $C_s$. The engaged reaction magnitude isThe gap first closes; additional mismatch is taken up by elastic deformation of the shaft and support. This explains why the bearing axial displacement allowance matters. The locating/non-locating arrangement is intended to accommodate relative motion rather than create an unintended thermal restraint.^[ref]

For hypothetical $C_b=2.5\times 10^{-8}m/N$, $C_s=10^{-7}m/N$, $g=0.10\mathrm{mm}$ and ${\delta }_{\mathrm{th}}=0.30\mathrm{mm}$, the effective stiffness is $1/(C_b+C_s)=8MN/m$ and the load is1.6kN. The stored elastic energy in this combined linear compliance isThis is stored energy; the frictionless elastic model does not itself predict heat loss during a complete reversible cycle.

If the housing is fixed and free mismatch is $\alpha L\Delta T$, the bearing end-stop engagement temperature increment is $\Delta T_{\ast }=g/(\alpha L)$. With hypothetical $\alpha =12\times 10^{-6}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$ and $L=0.50\mathrm{m}$, the0.10mm gap closes at about16.67K temperature increase. Further heating raises the load according to the engaged stiffness.

The positive-part relation is a simple instance of unilateral contact complementarity: the stop supplies a reaction only when the corresponding clearance is exhausted. Shaft inertia, impact, friction or bearing preload require a more complete model. In particular, this static compatibility calculation does not determine a collision force when a moving assembly first hits the stop.