A cohort model explains spoken word recognition through an evolving set of candidate words, the lexical cohort. An initial stretch of speech activates plausible candidates; later acoustic evidence and, depending on the model version, contextual information constrain recognition. William D. Marslen-Wilson and Alan Welsh's 1978 study connected this account with experimental manipulations of continuous speech.[ref]
Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech by William D. Marslen-Wilson and Alan Welsh. Introduction and Abstract; cohort framework and task comparisons
For an illustrative English vocabulary, the opening sounds of “candle”, “candy” and “canister” initially overlap. Hearing the next consonant can remove “canister” while leaving the other two plausible; later sounds separate them. The candidates depend on pronunciation and the listener's vocabulary, not merely on matching written letters.
A deliberately simplified noise-free rule isHere is the candidate set after the evidence available at step . This filtering illustration is not a fitted psychological model: noisy speech, graded activation and recovery from misleading evidence require additional assumptions. A uniqueness point concerns when the remaining acoustic prefix distinguishes a word within a specified vocabulary; it need not coincide with the listener's measured response time.
The original task comparisons motivate testing a model on intermediate behaviour and contextual effects, not just final accuracy.[ref]
Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech by William D. Marslen-Wilson and Alan Welsh. Abstract; distinct effects in shadowing and mispronunciation detection
New to topics? Read the docs here!