Common attenuation in third-order pulse correlation
ID: common-attenuation-in-third-order-pulse-correlation
Common attenuation in third-order pulse correlation multiplies the entire input intensity profile by one constant factor before the correlation is formed. For the ideal signalreplacing by gives . All unnormalized lobes scale together, so division by the central peak removes this common factor. The primary correlator paper defines the three-intensity-factor integral and implements it through second-harmonic generation and sum-frequency generation.[ref]
A Single Shot 3rd Order Cross-Correlator for Pulse Contrast and Pulse Shape Measurements by J. Collier and others. printed p. 194, defining integral and nonlinear optical implementation
The factor is an intensity transmission. An optical field-amplitude factor instead gives intensity factor and correlation factor . Confusing these conventions changes the predicted power law. A spectral filter that reshapes or chirps the pulse is also not necessarily a common scalar attenuation.
An original example takes an ideal central signal 100 and a side lobe 1 in consistent detector-signal units. Halving the full input intensity gives central 12.5 and side 0.125; their ratio remains 0.01. In contrast, attenuation scaling of a third-order correlation ghost changes only the delayed replica and predicts different real-lobe and ghost powers. A common attenuator cannot perform that selective test.
A fixed background changes what normalization appears to show. Add one unremoved signal unit to both locations. Before attenuation the observed side/center ratio is . After common intensity transmission , it is . The apparent side feature has grown relative to the peak even though the optical profile did not change. Detector baseline subtraction and a verified linear readout are therefore part of the experiment.
Shot-to-shot intensity variation supplies another consequence. Let the common intensity multiplier be , where has zero mean. ThenFor equally likely multipliers 0.9 and 1.1, the mean intensity is unchanged but the mean cubic signal is times the unit-intensity signal. This cubic intensity-noise bias in pulse correlation shows why cubing a mean input is not equivalent to averaging third-order signals. The calculation assumes the pulse shape is unchanged on each shot.
A controlled check records pulse intensity alongside the correlator signal, varies a broadband common attenuator, and tests cubic scaling in an unsaturated interval after background correction. Failure of that test can indicate detector nonlinearity, pulse reshaping or an uncontrolled background; it does not uniquely identify a particular fault. The ideal law applies only while the nonlinear gate and optical overlap retain their stipulated response.
New to topics? Read the docs here!