Consistency bound for separately measured heterodyne arm powers

ID: consistency-bound-for-separately-measured-heterodyne-arm-powers

The consistency bound for separately measured heterodyne arm powers is the requirement that the corrected peak beat current not exceed the maximum permitted by the two separately measured arm currents:
Here are positive, dark-corrected currents and is the beat amplitude after correcting the electrical frequency response. The same collection geometry, detector responsivity and stable illumination must apply to all three measurements, as in separating power imbalance from mode mismatch in optical beating.
The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives a short physical proof. Write the collected optical fields as vectors in the detector-weighted inner product, with squared norms proportional to . Their cross term obeys and the beat amplitude is . Equivalently, their Gram matrix
is a positive semidefinite matrix, so its determinant cannot be negative. This is an overlap constraint rather than an empirical correction factor.
Measurement uncertainty matters when interpreting an apparent violation. In an original example, and give . Suppose the three readings have independent relative standard uncertainty. From , the relative uncertainty is approximately , giving . The excess above unity is only about standard uncertainties; it does not establish a physical overlap above one. Correlated calibration influences change the variance of a corrected heterodyne overlap estimate.[ref]
NIST's receiver experiment separately addressed optical mode/polarization matching, electrical losses and impedance mismatch.[ref] Interleaving the two arm-current measurements with the beat measurement helps detect source drift. Dark subtraction, detector nonlinearity or a changed collection aperture can also produce inconsistent inputs to the bound.

New to topics? Read the docs here!