First-order optical coherence
ID: first-order-optical-coherence
Consider one selected polarization of waves, represented by complex fields and at two sampling positions. Suppose their second moments are finite and stationary: and the following uncentered wave-field correlation do not depend on the absolute time . DefineThe star denotes the complex conjugate; brackets denote an ensemble average. A long detector average estimates this quantity only if it adequately samples the fluctuations. The superscript identifies a field correlation: it does not mean the autocorrelation of the measured light intensity. The one-position version is , so for every nonzero field covered by this definition; this alone says nothing about its correlation at nonzero delay. [ref].
The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives . At a specified delay, magnitude one means in mean square for a fixed nonzero complex : the samples have a reproducible relation in both wave amplitude and wave phase. Magnitude zero means the averaged field cross term vanishes. It need not mean statistical independence. A deterministic phase difference changes the argument of , not its complex modulus; a distorted but fixed wavefront can therefore remain fully coherent. [ref]
https://www.rp-photonics.com/coherence.html. Paschotta, Coherence: static distortions versus fluctuating distortions
.To see the observable, recombine the samples in the same detected spatial mode with matched wave polarizations. With a common positive conversion factor , let be the single-arm light intensities reaching that detector. Adding givesThis follows simply by expanding the squared complex modulus and averaging, then taking the maximum and minimum as spans a full cycle. The extra wave phase scan must leave and the magnitude of the correlation effectively unchanged. Thus interferometric visibility equals only for equal nonzero light intensities and ideal mode matching. For , perfectly coherent beams have interferometric visibility ; a measured value would imply under these assumptions. Orthogonal linear polarizations, background light, unresolved interference fringes or vibrations can reduce measured contrast further. One absent arm gives zero contrast and makes the normalized two-sample correlation undefined.
New to topics? Read the docs here!