Kenneth E. Ward was a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics researcher whose wind tunnel investigations examined interactions between aircraft components. He also coauthored the systematic related-airfoil investigation with Eastman N. Jacobs and Robert M. Pinkerton.[ref]
Interference Effects and Drag of Struts on a Monoplane Wing by Kenneth E. Ward. Byline, Introduction and Apparatus and Tests
[ref]In his 1931 strut experiment, a 5-by-30-inch Göttingen 387 airfoil was tested first alone and then with inclined struts attached in different upper- and lower-surface positions. The variable-density wind tunnel operated at 20 atmospheres and approximately . A repeated wing-alone test before and after the strut trials checked the comparison's repeatability. Separate strut measurements helped isolate aerodynamic interference.[ref]
Interference Effects and Drag of Struts on a Monoplane Wing by Kenneth E. Ward. Printed pp.2–5, Apparatus and Tests and Discussion of Results
The central question is whether component drag adds. Define an interaction residual at matched operating conditions byFor invented measurements of , and, respectively, . The assembly's drag increase is twice what the isolated struts contribute. Ward reported that interaction drag could be as large as the struts' own drag; the numerical forces here simply illustrate the subtraction.[ref]
Interference Effects and Drag of Struts on a Monoplane Wing by Kenneth E. Ward. Summary and Discussion of Results, interference compared with isolated strut drag
This aircraft component drag interaction is why a streamlined part cannot be assessed solely in isolation. Changing its location also changes neighboring pressure and fluid flow. Comparable Reynolds numbers, mounting corrections and repeat measurements are needed to distinguish that interaction from a changed test condition.
New to topics? Read the docs here!