Nearest-neighbour model of graphene
ID: nearest-neighbour-model-of-graphene
Take a planar honeycomb lattice with two sites per primitive cell and one localized atomic orbital per site. In this explicitly idealized tight-binding model, all three nearest-neighbour hopping matrix elements are , with ; there is no on-site offset or further-neighbour hopping. Ignore Electron interactions and treat physical spin as a separate degeneracy. Let the bond length be , and choose the three vectors from an site to its neighbours asThe Bloch state amplitudes on form a two-component vector. A consistent phase convention gives the HamiltonianIts characteristic equation is , giving the two displayed energy bands. The two-component structure comes from the two sites, rather than two values of physical spin. This is a particularly small matrix model in which a crystal's geometry creates an unexpected low-energy law.
A honeycomb lattice produces two touching electronic bands
. Original nearest-neighbour model with the defined bond vectors. The surface shows the calculated bands near one zero of , with distance in units of inverse bond length and energy in units of the hopping magnitude. These are model energies, not measured band data. Source. Details.Historically, Philip Russell Wallace used a tight-binding model to investigate the electronic band structure of graphite in 1947. The material in that paper was layered graphite; the single-sheet model here isolates one simpler part of the problem.[ref]
The Band Theory of Graphite by Philip Russell Wallace. Publisher abstract: tight-binding bands and Brillouin zones of graphite; published 1 May 1947
New to topics? Read the docs here!
