Optical pumping versus relaxation

ID: optical-pumping-versus-relaxation

For , setting the rate equations to zero gives the unique stationary distribution of this continuous-time Markov chain:
The nonzero mean magnetic quantum number represents atomic orientation. Increasing empties the bright state, but leaves two dark populations. For , relaxation alone gives . When and , every distribution with is stationary; the initial difference between the two dark populations survives. The equal dark populations below follow from the specified unpolarized initial condition.
Starting from , the solution for or is
For pure pumping, take in this formula. Its redistribution time is , longer than the mean scattering interval of a bright atom, because one third of scattering events return it to the same sublevel. For arbitrary initial populations the additional mode satisfies .
For an original numerical example choose and , with much larger than either. Then
At , , while . If the light is then switched off, relaxation returns all three populations toward with time constant . Faster optical preparation and slower dark recovery measure different combinations of rates.
In an optically thin uniform sample of atoms, with equal collection efficiency for each decay branch, the detected fluorescence count rate is approximately . The same scattering removes pump photons, giving when depletion is small. For the chosen example the steady scattering rate is per atom, compared with the initial . Pumping lowers this signal fivefold, while increasing transmission. If rapid mixing restores nearly uniform populations, scattering rises again. Reabsorption, strong attenuation, unequal collection efficiencies or coherent RF dynamics require a more detailed model; the reset rate does not stand for an exact RF Hamiltonian.

New to topics? Read the docs here!