 Solution

First remove the projector denominator explicitly:Let $A=(l+k{)}^2+m^2$ and $B=l^2$. The Feynman parameter for a simple and a squared propagator follows by differentiating the elementary two-denominator Feynman formula with respect to $B$ givesShift $q=l+xk$. Then $xA+(1-x)B=q^2+D$, with $D=x(1-x)k^2+x{m}^2$. The numerator is unchanged by this parallel shift:Therefore the correctly combined integral isThe printed weight $x/2$ is not compatible with this denominator and prefactor. Exchanging $x$ with $1-x$ changes the mass term in $D$ as well and cannot supply the missing normalization. A concrete counterexample is $m=0$ with nonzero spacelike external momentum and $2<d<4$: after Wick rotation, the remaining integral is nonzero and symmetric under $x\leftrightarrow 1-x$. The source's $4e^2\int (x/2)dx$ expression is then exactly one quarter of the correct expression. Thus the claimed equality cannot be imposed when computing the pole.