Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-advanced-quantum-physics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2014/paper-1/4/solution

The quoted expansion is nondegenerate perturbation theory for a known isolated eigenstate of a time-independent Hamiltonian. A useful small-mixing condition is for coupled states. First order is a diagonal expectation value; second order describes virtual mixing. A degenerate or nearly degenerate coupled subspace must first be treated by diagonalization there. Symmetry can eliminate terms, and convergence still needs checking. Ground-state second-order shifts are nonpositive because all denominators are negative.[ref]
For the rotational Stark effect, , where is the polar angle to the field. The source calls it azimuthal, which is inconsistent with this coupling. Rotor states have parity , while is odd, so every first-order matrix element within one fixed- manifold vanishes. The degeneracy therefore causes no first-order splitting.
Only with the same contribute in second order. Using their energy differences and ,
For this simplifies to the quadratic Stark shift of a polar linear rotor,
For , only contributes, with squared angular matrix element and denominator :
Here is the rotational energy constant, unlike the magnetic field in Question3.
The unperturbed line gives . The shifts are for and for . Subtracting the common lower-state shift gives transition shifts and . Their separation determines the dipole moment from a rotational Stark doublet:
The unit is the debye. Using external and gives , consistent with weak-field perturbation theory. The two shifted frequencies are about and ; polarization selects or . The inferred value is a magnitude; these shifts do not determine the dipole's sign.[ref][ref]
Figure 1.
Opposite-parity mixing produces quadratic rotor shifts and a polarization-dependent rotational doublet
. Source. Details.

New to topics? Read the docs here!