5
ID: past-exam-of-the-analytic-number-theory-and-elliptic-curves-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2010/b/5
Past exam of the analytic number theory and elliptic curves course of the University of Oxford 2010 B 5 by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
We first prove all three general torsion assertions before treating the lettered cases. If a finite point has , the cubic term dominates the integral lower terms, so , for an integer . Its parameter then lies in , with norm at most . The integral Weierstrass model defines its formal group at infinity over : using gives , an integral power series starting in degree three.
The supplied torsion estimate excludes a nonzero torsion parameter for , since , and the lower bound increases for higher -powers. For it excludes orders with , because their bound is strictly above . The remaining possibility is order two, which would imply the finite point equals its negative and hence . A nonintegral cannot solve the monic cubic with integral coefficients, so this is impossible too. Thus every finite torsion point has integral , and the equation then forces integral .
For good reduction the reduction map is a group homomorphism whose kernel is this formal group at infinity. Its torsion-free kernel proves injectivity on torsion, giving a subgroup of the finite reduced group. Applying local integrality to a rational torsion point at every prime gives .
If , the double of a rational torsion point is finite and integral. The doubling formulatherefore implies . Also . Evaluating the supplied polynomial identity at the integral now givesThis establishes the needed Nagell–Lutz theorem conclusions without assuming them in the lettered applications.
New to topics? Read the docs here!