Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-astrophysics-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2015/7/d/solution

For the isotropic Jeans-Abel mass inversion, let and . The two preceding projections have the same Abel integral equation kernel, giving
Their ratio recovers , and the isotropic Jeans equation gives
Equivalently put and . Then : the common stellar luminosity cancels from the inferred mass. Differentiating these singular-kernel integrals is understood through suitable regularity or a nonsingular variable change, not by naively keeping an infinite lower-end boundary term.
The inversion assumes adequate radial coverage, convergence and a smooth spherical equilibrium. In practice derivatives amplify noise and the unobserved outer tail needs treatment or a model. Unknown anisotropy reintroduces a mass–anisotropy degeneracy; the uniqueness just derived is conditional on the explicitly isotropic velocity distribution.

New to topics? Read the docs here!