Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-biological-physics-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2015/3/c/solution

Assume the structural surface charge density stays fixed while a divalent chloride is added, without changing or . Let and be the increment of the bulk divalent concentration. Electroneutral addition also increases bulk chloride by . Varying the squared Grahame equation at fixed gives
At a strongly negative wall, coions are small. Dropping their contribution to the denominator and in the numerator gives the requested leading approximation
The includes the change in bulk osmotic concentration of one added divalent counterion and its two monovalent coions. The numerator's increment is a bulk concentration; the denominator contains surface concentrations.[ref] Extra counterions screen the wall and make its negative electric potential less negative. At fixed bulk calcium, therefore decreases. Under the stipulated proportionality, synaptic activity decreases as well; this argument isolates electrostatic accumulation rather than assuming a separate specific magnesium effect on the ion channels.
For , the printed linear approximation gives . Linearizing the activity too gives , or approximately a reduction. Exponentiating this approximate voltage instead gives . Neither is a controlled finite-increment prediction: the added divalent concentration is 2.5 times its initial value.
A consistent finite-change calculation is possible within the same Poisson-Boltzmann equation. Define, using throughout,
Fixed requires . The physical positive root is , giving
Thus the self-consistent finite-change estimate is about a 40.4% reduction. Both estimates rely on fixed surface charge, ideal ionic activities, and unchanged bulk calcium; the limitations of the large local concentrations remain.

New to topics? Read the docs here!