 Solution

For a gas whose lifetime is much less than the selected horizon, the numerator of its global warming potential has nearly saturated: ${\int }_0^H{a}_i{m}_i(t)dt\simeq a_i{m}_i(0){\tau }_i$. The carbon-dioxide denominator continues to accumulate because of its long-lived response. Consequently a shorter horizon usually gives a larger GWP for this short-lived substitute; a longer horizon gives a smaller GWP. If the horizon becomes comparable to, or shorter than, the substitute's lifetime, the numerator also depends strongly on the horizon and cannot be replaced by its infinite-time limit.

The horizon is a value choice, and integrated forcing is not the same as temperature at a chosen future date. Equal-GWP pulses can therefore have different near-term warming and long-term temperature paths. The result also depends on greenhouse gas radiative efficiency, background concentrations, lifetime estimates and which indirect chemical effects or feedbacks are included. A pulse-based metric does not by itself describe a continuing emissions trajectory, nor does it measure ozone depletion or local air-pollution impacts. Comparisons should state the horizon, the emission scenario and the chosen climate outcome.^[ref]