 Solution

Interpret the reported angles as total scattering angles $\psi =2\theta$. The photon energy givesCombining $2d\sin \theta =\lambda$ with the two index assignments yieldsThe slight difference is consistent with the rounded angular data, givingThe intensity estimate needs a stated convention. The geometric structure factors obey $|F_{111}{|}^2=32|f_{111}{|}^2$ and $|F_{220}{|}^2=64|f_{220}{|}^2$, so equal atomic factors give a single-directed-reflection ratio $1/2$. For a powder line, the powder diffraction multiplicities are eight for $\{111\}$ and twelve for $\{220\}$. Hence a multiplicity-and-structure-factor estimate isif other angle-dependent factors are neglected.

A measured integrated powder intensity also contains the Lorentz-polarization factor, atomic form factor, thermal-motion factor and instrument/sample corrections. For example, in the common unpolarized symmetric powder geometry,Including this factor but still taking equal atomic factors gives $I_{111}/I_{220}\simeq 0.9725$, rather than $1/3$. More generally,within that geometry, before other corrections. The actual form factors and measurement geometry are not supplied, so no unique precision experimental peak-height ratio follows. The values $1/2$, $1/3$ and $0.9725$ refer to distinct explicitly stated levels of approximation; a powder family must not be silently treated as one directed reflection.