Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-general-relativity-and-cosmology-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2017/4/d/solution

As the temperature falls, electrons and protons form neutral hydrogen through cosmological recombination. The free electron fraction drops sharply, and so does the scattering rate . When this rate becomes comparable to or smaller than the Hubble parameter, the plasma becomes transparent and photon decoupling occurs. The Thomson scattering cross-section itself does not abruptly vanish. The rapid change is in the abundance of free targets.
The Hydrogen binding energy is , but recombination occurs at a much smaller thermal energy, of order , or a few thousand kelvin. There are roughly a billion photons per baryon, so the high-energy tail can keep hydrogen ionized long after drops below the binding energy. The falling exponential ionizing tail then makes the transition comparatively sharp. Last scattering follows when sufficiently few electrons remain free.[ref]
To estimate a horizon, specify an expansion model as well as the redshift. The proper particle horizon at emission is
As a transparent analytic estimate, approximate a spatially flat matter-dominated universe by throughout. Then
Taking the illustrative present value , this model has . At ,
This is a proper horizon radius at emission; its corresponding present comoving length is about .
For the same model the comoving distance to the Cosmic microwave background last-scattering surface and its angular diameter distance are
Therefore the angular extent associated with one radial horizon length is
This is an order-one-degree estimate. Including the earlier radiation domination and late dark energy changes the coefficient; it does not make the horizon span the sky. A horizon patch diameter has twice this angle, whereas the acoustic scale uses a sound horizon and differs again. The redshift by itself, without an expansion model or normalization, is insufficient for a unique horizon distance.
The horizon problem is that the observed cosmic microwave background has nearly the same mean temperature across angular separations vastly greater than this scale. In the purely decelerating Hot Big Bang model, sufficiently separated last-scattering regions had neither time to exchange signals nor a common post-Big-Bang causal region that could establish their observed thermal uniformity. The puzzle concerns the missing causal explanation of those initial correlations; it is not an inconsistency of specifying uniform initial conditions mathematically. An earlier period of cosmic inflation can enlarge a formerly causally connected region beyond the later observable horizon.

New to topics? Read the docs here!