Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-lie-algebras-and-representation-theory-of-symmetric-groups-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2009/b/6/solution

Use the standard invariant tabloid bilinear form, with the tabloid basis orthonormal. Each permutation acts by an orthogonal matrix, so . Inversion permutes and preserves its signs. Therefore
The James submodule theorem states that for any submodule , either or . Use the allowed fact . The coefficient of in is one, so the displayed adjoint identity gives . If is not orthogonal to , some and some tableau have . Hence , and its permutation translates span . This proves the theorem.
Let . Every proper submodule of lies in by the theorem. If the restricted form is nonzero, is proper, hence is the unique maximal submodule and
In the stronger nondegenerate case specified in the question, , so itself is simple. The nonzero-form version also covers the possibly degenerate case needed in the final calculation.
For shape , identify with with basis . Its Specht module is the augmentation subspace , spanned freely by , . Its Gram matrix is , with diagonal entries two and off-diagonal entries one. Equivalently, in is the span of . This vector belongs to exactly when . Thus the restricted radical has dimension one if and zero otherwise, giving
For this quotient is nonzero and simple by the theorem. In the small exceptional case , the canonical radical quotient is zero, as the same dimension formula states; it is then not a nonzero simple module. This qualification distinguishes the numerical formula from the nonzero-form hypothesis.

New to topics? Read the docs here!