Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-logic-and-set-theory-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2010/b/4/d/solution

True in ZF. Suppose were countably infinite. The singleton injection would inject into the natural numbers. The set cannot be finite, since its power set would then be finite. Its image is therefore an infinite subset of , which has a canonical increasing enumeration. This gives a bijection without choice.
But then , contradicting Cantor's theorem that the latter is strictly larger than . Hence
The proof does not assume that an arbitrary infinite set contains a countably infinite subset; here the given injection into the natural numbers supplies its well-ordering.

New to topics? Read the docs here!