The power set is the set of all subsets of , including the empty set and itself. It is useful whenever an object is a selection rather than an individual member: a possible collection of active vertices in a graph, for example, belongs to the power set of the vertex set.
For , the power set has eight members:Each of the three set elements is either included or excluded. More generally, if , these independent binary choices give . This is a bijection between subsets and binary strings of length , not a probabilistic independence assumption.
Ordering the subsets by inclusion gives a Boolean lattice. In the picture an upward edge adds one member. Complementation reverses inclusion, and union and intersection combine selections. The empty-input case is worth checking: has one member, not zero, consistently with .
For arbitrary sets each containing at least two elements, the displayed inequality follows by explicitly encoding two subsets in disjoint parts of a Cartesian product. Choose and , put along the row , put along the column , and add the extra point precisely when . These regions are disjoint, so the encoding recovers both and and is an injection from into . This proves the cardinality inequality even for infinite sets. For finite sizes , the same result is , since . Mapping to is insufficient because all pairs with an empty factor collapse.
There is no surjection from a set onto its power set . Consequently has strictly greater cardinality than .
For any candidate function , form . This is a subset of by set comprehension. If , then holds exactly when , a contradiction. Thus is missing from the image of . On the other hand, is an injection from into its power set, establishing the strict comparison of cardinalities. For , the omitted selection is the subset version of Cantor's diagonal argument.
For each natural number , the family of all -element subsets is nonempty when is not finite. These families are pairwise distinct elements of , giving an explicit injection of the natural numbers. No representative from each family is selected. A power set cannot be countably infinite in ZF: if were countably infinite, singleton injection would make an infinite subset of a countable set and hence countably infinite; Cantor's theorem would then contradict countability of its power set. Apply this to to make the displayed lower bound strict.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.
