Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematical-models-of-financial-derivatives-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2017/3/c/solution

For a fixed exercise threshold , the continuation value solves the same stationary equation but is matched to at that threshold. Boundedness at zero removes the negative power. Thus the fixed-threshold value of a perpetual call is
It is also , where is the first up-crossing stopping time. Differentiating while keeping the current fixed gives
This is positive for , so increasing such an early threshold increases its continuation value. The comparison assumes ; a policy already exercised has no remaining continuation value to vary.
If , then
Since , the derivative comparison gives for just below . Therefore quoting this policy value as the price of an unrestricted American call permits arbitrage: buy the option below its immediate exercise value and exercise it at once. A contract that actually commits its holder to the threshold is a different claim; its lower value is a suboptimal policy value, not by itself an arbitrage. The perpetual American call option optimizes over all exercise policies and remains above its exercise payoff.

New to topics? Read the docs here!