Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2001/iii/paper-19/1/i/solution

There is a necessary ordering qualification: the printed formula requires the even leg to be called . The primitive Pythagorean triple satisfies the printed hypotheses but cannot have . Thus the intended assertion is true after interchanging the two legs if necessary. We prove that version, including the parity condition on the parameters.
A primitive Pythagorean triple has pairwise coprime sides: a prime dividing any two also divides the third. The two legs cannot both be odd, since their squares would sum to , and cannot both be even. Call the odd leg and the even leg ; then is odd. The positive integers
satisfy and are coprime, since a common divisor divides both and . A product of coprime positive integers is a square only when both factors are squares, by their prime factorizations. Write , . Then , , and
Furthermore have opposite parity, since is odd. Conversely these coprimality and parity conditions give a primitive triple: the square identity follows by expansion, and a common odd prime divisor of its legs would divide both , while the odd leg excludes a common factor two. This is the primitive Pythagorean parametrization.

New to topics? Read the docs here!