Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2001/iii/paper-74/1/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 74 1 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A Dedekind domain is a Noetherian integrally closed domain in which every nonzero prime ideal is maximal. The equivalent local characterization is that its localizations at nonzero prime ideals are discrete valuation rings. A field is harmless as the dimension-zero case.
Write for the domain, for its fraction field and for the nonzero fractional ideal. Its proposed inverse is an -submodule of . Choose with , so and the inverse is nonzero. Choose also . Every satisfies , hence . Writing with gives . Thus is a fractional ideal; the Noetherian hypothesis also makes it finitely generated.
For a nonzero maximal prime ideal , the discrete valuation ring makes principal, say . We need to justify that inversion commutes with this localization. One inclusion is immediate. Conversely, if , finite generation of supplies a common such that . Therefore , provingIt follows that at every such prime ideal. Globally . If this were a proper ideal, it would be contained in a maximal ideal and would remain proper after localizing there, a contradiction. In the field case every nonzero fractional ideal is the whole field. Hence in all casesThis proves that every nonzero fractional ideal of a Dedekind domain is an invertible fractional ideal, rather than presupposing its inverse exists.
New to topics? Read the docs here!