 Solution

In bond percolation on the square lattice, every nearest-neighbour edge independently has state one, meaning open, with probability $p$, and state zero, meaning closed, with probability $1-p$. Thus the configuration law is the product measure ${\mathbb{P}}_p={⨂}_{e\in E}\mathrm{Bernoulli}(p)$. An open path in bond percolation uses only open edges. An increasing event $A$ satisfies $\omega \in A,{\omega }^{\prime }\ge \omega \Rightarrow {\omega }^{\prime }\in A$: opening further edges cannot destroy the event.

The Harris-FKG inequality for two increasing events isFor disjoint occurrence of increasing events, write $A\square B$ when disjoint sets of open edges separately witness $A$ and $B$, so each event is forced by its own witness regardless of the other edges. The Van den Berg-Kesten inequality statesFor events given by cylinder sets these are finite-coordinate assertions. Connection events have finite open-path witnesses; truncating to finite boxes and taking increasing limits gives the same disjoint-occurrence bound for them. Sharing a vertex between the two witness paths is permitted; sharing an edge is not.

For $1\le m<n$, take a simple open path from the origin to the radius-$n$ boundary and let $x$ be its first vertex on the radius-$m$ boundary. Its initial segment witnesses $0\leftrightarrow x$. If $z$ is its final vertex, then $\Vert z-x{\Vert }_{\infty }\ge n-m$. Consequently the remaining segment reaches $x+\partial {\Lambda }_{n-m}$, and its initial portion until that visit witnesses $x\leftrightarrow x+\partial {\Lambda }_{n-m}$. The two segments use disjoint edges. HenceThe union bound, Van den Berg-Kesten inequality and translation invariance of the product measure now give the weighted BK boundary-splitting estimateFor $m=n$ the same bound follows directly from the union bound, with $g_0=1$. With the conventional $\partial {\Lambda }_0=\{0\}$, $m=0$ gives equality.

Write $C(0)$ for the percolation cluster of the origin. By summing its membership indicators, the percolation susceptibility isIf it is finite, then $a_m\to 0$. For $0<p<1$, choose $m$ with $0<a_m=a<1$. Iterating the boundary-splitting estimate with this fixed $m$ givesFor $k\ge 2m$, $\lfloor k/m\rfloor \ge k/(2m)$, so $g_k\le \exp [-(-\log a)k/(2m)]$. To handle all smaller positive radii without an unspecified prefactor, observe that $g_k\le g_1=1-(1-p{)}^4<1$. ThereforeFor $1\le k<2m$, the second chosen rate gives $e^{-\gamma k}\ge g_1$, and for larger $k$ the first rate applies. At $k=0$ both sides equal one. The endpoint $p=0$ has $g_k=0$ for every $k\ge 1$, so any positive rate works; $p=1$ is excluded by finite susceptibility. This proves exponential one-arm decay from finite susceptibility with the required unit prefactor.