Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2002/iii/paper-45/4/c/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 45 4 c Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Interpret the requested scale-dependent rms as the contribution from a logarithmic band of wavelengths, or equivalently a band centered at . A global uncut rms is not finite for this scale-free spectrum. The dimensionless density power per logarithmic wavenumber isThe cosmological Poisson equation gives . ThereforeThis is the potential fluctuations per logarithmic wavenumber scaling. A simple dimensional argument gives the same answer: the density amplitude on scale is proportional to , and its potential amplitude is of order , supplying two additional powers of .
For , the Harrison-Zeldovich spectrum has scale-independent potential amplitude per logarithmic interval. If the density-spectrum amplitude grows as , then , so the potential amplitude evolves as . It is constant in the pure growing matter mode of an Einstein-de Sitter universe, where .
A literal total variance would be proportional to . Infrared convergence requires and ultraviolet convergence requires , so no index makes both ends finite. At both divergences are logarithmic. Thus cutoffs or a band specification are essential for a numerical rms; the boxed statement describes the intended scale-local fluctuations rather than claiming a finite unsmoothed potential variance.
New to topics? Read the docs here!