Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2004/iii/paper-25/2/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 25 2 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the following simple-root Hensel lemma. Let be a complete discrete valuation ring, with maximal ideal , and let . If and , there is a unique with and .
For the proof, define Newton's method iterates . Each denominator stays a unit, because all iterates are congruent to . Taylor's polynomial identity givesIf an iterate is already a root, the process stops. Otherwise these valuations tend to infinity, so the iterates form a Cauchy sequence in the complete ring. Its limit has the required residue and satisfies . If were two such roots, thenThe parenthesis is a unit, forcing .
Now let be finite, with residue field . For every choose a monic irreducible polynomial of degree and lift it to a monic . The lift is irreducible over , since a factorization would reduce to a factorization of , by the monic form of Gauss's lemma over the valuation ring. If for a root, its residue field contains of degree . The inequality forces residue degree and ramification index one. Thus it is an unramified extension of degree .
Conversely, in any unramified extension of degree , choose a generator of its residue field and lift its separable minimal polynomial. Hensel's lemma supplies a root with that residue. Its degree is at least and hence it generates the extension. The same unique lifting of all residue conjugates shows that the extension is Galois andOne can see uniqueness inside a fixed algebraic closure explicitly: the roots of lift all nonzero residue elements, and a lifted primitive residue element generates the extension. Hencewith arithmetic Frobenius acting by . The case simply gives . These are all finite unramified extensions; exactly when . Their union is the maximal unramified extension, whose Galois group is .
Finally prove norm-surjectivity on units using the Herbrand quotient. For a cyclic group of order , writeThe quotient is multiplicative on short exact sequences, equals one for finite modules, equals on the trivial module , and equals one on induced regular modules. For a finite module, the equality follows directly from .
Let . For sufficiently large , the equivariant p-adic logarithm identifies with additively. In the unramified case this is an induced regular lattice. Indeed choose a normal basis of the finite residue extension and lift its generating element. Its Galois conjugates reduce to a basis and hence form an -basis of ; their coordinate determinant is a unit. Since a uniformizer of is also one of , multiplication by its th power gives the same regular-module structure on . For a regular module, invariants are norm images and a vector of coefficient sum zero is a cyclic difference, so both indicated Tate cohomology groups vanish. Consequently . The quotient is finite, so .
Apply multiplicativity toIt gives . Hilbert 90 makes trivial, so . On the other handso the quotient maps onto . As its order is already , its unit kernel is trivial. A norm which is a unit comes from a unit, by the same valuation formula. ThereforeThe standard normal-basis theorem for finite fields and the convergent logarithm/exponential on sufficiently deep principal units are the ingredients used in evaluating the Herbrand quotient; the norm conclusion itself has been deduced here.
New to topics? Read the docs here!