Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2004/iii/paper-32/4/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 32 4 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a density matrix on a -dimensional Hilbert space, its Von Neumann entropy, in bits, iswhere the are its eigenvalues and . Each summand is nonnegative, proving , with equality exactly when one eigenvalue is one and the rest zero, namely for a pure state.
We first prove the nonnegativity of quantum relative entropy needed below. Diagonalize with eigenvalues and eigenvectors , and with eigenvalues and eigenvectors . Put and . Each row of sums to one. Concavity of the ordinary logarithm gives . ConsequentlyThe final Gibbs inequality follows directly from . Support failure gives ; zero eigenvalues can otherwise be handled by restriction or regularization. Equality requires and equality in the logarithm inequality on every positive-weight row. Thus is a eigenvector of eigenvalue wherever . The remaining diagonal entries of vanish and positivity makes the remaining rows and columns zero. Hence equality holds exactly when .
Taking gives , provingThe lower equality is attained exactly by pure states and the upper exactly by the maximally mixed state .
For , each positive-weight state has support contained in that of . Expanding the quantum relative entropy givesThis proves Concavity of Von Neumann entropy, with equality precisely when every positive-weight is the same state.
For the upper entropy bound for a quantum mixture, diagonalize each component, , and set . Form the rectangular matrix whose columns are . Then , while the Gram matrix has diagonal . The two matrices have the same nonzero eigenvalues: and map corresponding positive-eigenvalue eigenspaces isomorphically. Thus .
If there are columns, let , with . ThenAll the summands have the same Von Neumann entropy. The just-proved concavity therefore implies . Finally,We have proved both requested bounds:For the upper equality, strictness in the concavity argument forces to be diagonal. Its entries between two positive-weight component eigenvectors then force those vectors to be orthogonal. Thus upper equality holds exactly when the supports of the positive-weight component states are mutually orthogonal. In that case their classical label is perfectly distinguishable, explaining the extra bits.
New to topics? Read the docs here!