Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2006/iii/paper-22/4/a/solution

Use anti-Hermitian vector-bundle curvature and the fundamental matrix trace, so
is an integer on a closed oriented four-manifold. The supplied formula's phrase “extending ” is a typographical error in the original PDF: the connection extends the boundary connection . An extension exists, for example on the trivial bundle over , by extending a boundary connection through a collar and cutting it off farther inside.
For well-definedness, glue two choices and along their identified boundary bundles. Connections may be made product connections on a collar while keeping their boundary values, and the transgression identity below shows that this does not alter the relevant integral. The glued bundle over the resulting closed four-manifold has an integer Second Chern number. Therefore the two extension integrals differ by an integer, proving the value of is independent of all choices in . In particular, different extensions on one fixed bundle with the same boundary value have zero difference by transgression and Stokes theorem.
To compute the derivative, extend the boundary variation to an adjoint-valued one-form on and set . The vector-bundle curvature derivative is . Invariance of the trace and the Bianchi identity give
The second equality follows from the covariant product rule; its other term contains . Integrating and applying Stokes theorem, with the given boundary orientation, yields
This derivative means the derivative of any local real lift of the circle-valued functional; changing that lift by an integer changes no derivative.
If a bundle gauge transformation extends to on , use as the extension of the transformed boundary connection. Vector-bundle curvature is conjugated, so its trace square is unchanged pointwise. . This proof even preserves the chosen extension's real integral, before reducing modulo integers. The local Chern-Simons three-form transgresses the same characteristic form and is the boundary expression used in the compactness argument below.

New to topics? Read the docs here!