Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2007/iii/paper-40/3/solution

If the center violates a constraint, choose a row with . Under the assumption of nonempty , this row cannot have . Every satisfies . Thus the central half-space
contains , and the given outer bound yields . Checking the rows of therefore supplies a separation oracle. If a violated row has zero normal, it instead certifies that is empty.
Whiten the ellipsoid by and rotate the cut normal to . The normalized current ellipsoid is the unit ball centered at zero. In the stated covering ellipsoid, for , the shape matrix has eigenvalue in the direction and in each of the other directions. The center does not affect volume, so
Using for and for gives
Therefore
This is the central-cut ellipsoid volume bound. Affine transformations preserve the ratio. The displayed matrix formula is undefined when ; in that case interval bisection gives the stronger ratio .
Undoing the normalization gives the general central-cut update
It preserves containment of the feasible region while reducing volume geometrically. After cuts the volume is less than . If a feasible region has a known positive-volume lower bound , more than unsuccessful cuts would be impossible. For rational inputs, outer-radius and positive-volume bounds of exponential size in a polynomial of the bit length therefore translate into a polynomial iteration count.
For a full ellipsoid method proof, two qualifications matter. A nonempty rational polyhedron may be lower-dimensional and have zero volume, so shrinking below a volume threshold alone cannot certify its emptiness. One uses a bounded-feasibility reduction and a sufficiently small rational relaxation or an affine-hull treatment, with input-dependent rational separation bounds. Also ellipsoid updates involve square roots, so a bit-complexity proof rounds with controlled outward error to preserve containment and a fixed volume decrease. With these precision bounds, and the polynomial-time row separation oracle here, the method establishes polynomial-time linear programming. The volume calculation is its essential geometric step, not by itself the entire complexity proof.

New to topics? Read the docs here!