Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2008/ib/paper-2/11g/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ib Paper 2 11G Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
We prove the needed Hilbert basis theorem step rather than assuming it. Suppose is a commutative Noetherian ring and is an ideal. The set of leading coefficients of elements of , together with zero, is an ideal of : align degrees with powers of before addition, and use scalar multiplication. Choose finitely many generators of , represented by polynomials , and let be the maximum of their degrees. If then and there is nothing to prove.
For each , let consist of the coefficients of of elements of of degree at most . This is also an ideal of ; choose finitely many generating coefficients and representing polynomials of degree at most . The finite collection of all and generates : for any of degree , express its leading coefficient using those of and subtract the matching combination of to lower degree. When the degree becomes , use the representatives of to lower it again. Induction on degree eventually leaves zero.
A field is Noetherian because its only ideals are zero and the whole field. Repeatedly applying the proved step gives every ideal of finitely generated.
The coefficient restriction in the second ring says preciselyIt contains one and is closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication: . To show it is not Noetherian, consider the ideals in They form an ascending chain. In any with , the coefficient of is a polynomial in of degree at most , since the nonconstant part of introduces at least . It cannot equal ; hence . If the union ideal were finitely generated, all its generators would lie in one , forcing the chain to stabilize. This contradiction proves , the constant-plus-ideal non-Noetherian subring example.
New to topics? Read the docs here!