Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2008/iii/paper-13/4/a/solution

With the convention for a classical subsolution, the weak maximum principle for elliptic operators is
Here is uniformly elliptic with bounded drift, has no zeroth-order term, and the domain is bounded. Equivalently, gives .
One can see why measurable coefficients suffice for the pointwise classical statement by adding . Choose large enough that ; then . The perturbed subsolution cannot attain a maximum inside: its gradient would be zero and its Hessian negative semidefinite, forcing its elliptic second-order term to be nonpositive. Its maximum is therefore on the boundary. Letting proves the stated estimate. Only the symmetric part of acts on the Hessian, and ellipticity gives its positive definiteness.

New to topics? Read the docs here!