Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2008/iii/paper-37/1/a/solution

The initial-value convention is essential. A continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant, so the conclusion is up to indistinguishability of stochastic processes. The stated zero conclusion uses the usual zero-start convention ; without it, is a counterexample.
Put . Let be its total-variation process, and stop when either or reaches . The resulting process is a bounded continuous local martingale, hence a true martingale, and its total variation on every time interval is bounded by . Fix and take deterministic partitions whose mesh tends to zero. Orthogonality of martingale increments gives
Pathwise,
by uniform continuity of a continuous path on . The sums are bounded by , so the dominated convergence theorem makes their expectations tend to zero. Hence almost surely. Take the countable intersection over rational and integer , use path continuity, and then let . The stopping times tend to infinity because the original path and its finite variation are bounded on every compact time interval. Thus

New to topics? Read the docs here!