Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2009/iii/paper-27/4/c/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 27 4 c Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let for , and write and . The Hecke operator acts on the Fourier expansion by . Since , the primitive relation is . Hence and for . Substituting the argument directly in the Fricke involution givesThus, in the basis , put and let be the reversal matrix, . The matrices areIf the exam's rescaling is used, multiply the second matrix by .
Here is an explicit irreducibility argument for the prime-power old block at a bad prime. Any nonzero common invariant complex subspace contains an eigenvector of the restricted . Its eigenvalue is either or zero. If , the -eigenspace is ; containing it gives by reversal, then every by successive powers of . The kernel of is . If instead contains this vector, reversal and giveThis is nonzero: the bad-prime eigenvalue of a trivial-character newform satisfies when , and when , whereas . If , the kernel is already , and the same reversal-and-shift argument works. Therefore the block has no nonzero proper subspace invariant under and the Fricke operator, and hence none invariant under the full ring in the question.
New to topics? Read the docs here!