Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2009/iii/paper-29/1/c/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 29 1 c Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
First justify optional sampling for the square-minus-bracket process. The Doob L2 maximal inequality gives . Stop the local martingale using a localizing sequence and bounded bracket levels. The stopped expectation identity, followed by Fatou, bounds by the expected squared path supremum. Hence has an integrable absolute supremum, and localization with conditional dominated convergence makes it a uniformly integrable martingale. The optional stopping theorem stated in part (b) is therefore applicable to both and .
For ordered stopping times , expand the squared increment and condition on . The mean increment is zero, soThis is the conditional bracket isometry for stopped martingale increments. Apply it with , and multiply by the bounded -measurable variable . The orthogonality proved in part (b) gives the Itô isometry
To identify the whole bracket process, let and . For deterministic and , apply the proved isometry to the simple integrand . It yieldsThus . Since is a martingale, the cross term has conditional mean zero. Consequently is a martingale. The process is continuous, adapted, nondecreasing and starts at zero, so uniqueness in the definition of quadratic variation provesThis deduction uses only the proved elementary isometry, not a previously assumed formula for the quadratic variation of stochastic integrals.
New to topics? Read the docs here!