Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2009/iii/paper-47/4/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 47 4 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-14
An experimentally observed example of CP violation is the long-lived neutral kaon decay . The two-pion spin-zero final state is CP even, whereas would be the CP-odd neutral-kaon state in the CP-conserving limit. Its two-pion decay reveals CP violation. The historical experimental account is cern-courier.web.cern.ch/a/cp-violations-early-days/ .
For the CKM matrix, diagonalize the up- and down-quark mass matrices independently by biunitary transformations. Writewith and positive diagonal matrices. Only the left transformations enter the weak charged current, because its chiral projector removes the right-handed fields. Substitution givesThe matrix is unitary but need not be diagonal: the two left mass diagonalizations generally differ.
Using the field transformations in the subparts and reordering the anticommuting Dirac fields, the charged bilinear transforms aswhere the fields on the right are both evaluated at . The W boson contributes its second minus sign and Lorentz parity factor, so the product maps into its Hermitian-conjugate product. Crucially CP symmetry acts unitarily: it does not separately complex-conjugate the numerical coefficient . Thus the transformed interaction isComparing with the original interaction requires in this canonical CP convention. The physical condition is quark rephasing and CP conservation:A merely complex-looking matrix in an arbitrary mass-eigenstate phase convention is not itself proof of CP violation.
For CKM parameter counting, a unitary matrix has real parameters: mixing angles and phases. Rephasing the up and down mass eigenfields removes phases, since their common phase cancels out of . For generic nondegenerate masses this leavesThere is one physical phase for three families and none for one or two. Degenerate masses would permit additional transformations, so the generic count need not apply unchanged.
For the QCD part of the gauge covariant derivative, define the Hermitian colour matrix and chooseThis sign convention agrees with the field-strength definition in the source. The kinetic term contains . A vector bilinear under CP changes sign, gains the Lorentz parity matrix, and transposes its colour matrix upon exchanging quark and antiquark. Invariance of this interaction therefore requires the CP transformation of a non-Abelian gauge connection:Both the time/spatial distinction and the colour transpose are essential; individual colour components need not all share one charge-conjugation sign.
The same gauge covariant derivative givesApply the transformation above and the chain rule . The transpose reverses commutator order, , so the nonlinear term transforms with the same overall minus sign as the derivatives. This proves the CP transformation of non-Abelian field strength:Finally rewrites the theta density as . The two minus signs cancel, and transposition followed by cyclicity leaves the colour trace unchanged. But the four parity matrices acting on the Levi-Civita symbol contribute . HenceThe density is C even and P odd, therefore CP odd. A generic fixed nonzero theta coefficient violates CP symmetry. This is the source of the Strong CP problem, separate from the charged-current phase in the CKM matrix.
New to topics? Read the docs here!