 Solution

The quasar proximity effect is weaker Lyman-alpha forest absorption near a quasar's emission redshift. Extra photons from the quasar increase the photoionization rate and reduce the neutral fraction without necessarily reducing the total gas density.

For isotropic specific intensity $J_{\nu }$ and a steady, isotropically radiating quasar with spectral luminosity $L_{\nu }$, the background and local rates areHere $r$ is a proper separation small enough that attenuation and expansion across it can initially be neglected, and ${\sigma }_{\nu }$ is the hydrogen photoionization cross-section. At fixed density and temperature, photoionization equilibrium makes the neutral column density, and hence a given line's optical depth, scale asThe observed quasar luminosity supplies ${\Gamma }_Q(r)$; the distance at which the absorption changes significantly estimates where ${\Gamma }_Q\sim {\Gamma }_{\mathrm{bg}}$. Adopting a background spectral shape then converts the inferred rate to its specific intensity, often quoted near the hydrogen ionization energy threshold.

Important uncertainties include an enhanced gas density contrast around the host, the unobserved ionizing spectrum, anisotropic emission, source lifetime and variability, the systemic redshift and continuum placement, attenuation between source and absorber, and fluctuations between lines of sight. Higher gas density enhances recombination and can partially hide the effect, biasing a simple background estimate upward. Dall'Aglio, Wisotzki and Worseck's 2008 measurements illustrate the observed sightline scatter and the roles of variability and clustering.