Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2010/iii/paper-5/2/b/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 5 2 b Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write and . The exponent on the finite-set expression is in the PDF; the TeX aid drops its prime. Ignore zero-measure sets, whose integrals vanish. The equivalence isFor the first bound, let and choose a finite-measure subset . Since ,Exhaust by its intersections with bounded balls. If its measure is finite these give the desired bound in the limit; if it is infinite they force . Now take the supremum over .
For the other direction it suffices to assume ; the zero and infinite cases are immediate. For a set with , the layer cake representation givesSplit at . The first contribution is , and the second is . Their sum is . Multiply by and take the supremum. This proves the equivalence even when the quantities are extended-valued. The integral expression is an actual norm on the weak Lq space, since the triangle inequality holds inside every set integral. The distribution-function expression is generally a quasi-norm. The factor is sharp: on has and attains on every initial interval. In higher dimensions, multiply this example by the indicator of a unit box in the remaining coordinates.
New to topics? Read the docs here!