Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2013/iii/paper-36/1/c/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 36 1 c Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Use the stated characterization by the Lq null space property. Raising an Lq quasi-norm comparison to its positive exponent preserves its order, so the hypothesis at says that, for every nonzero and every ,We prove the corresponding inequality; this is monotonicity of uniform sparse recovery in the exponent.
Fix a nonzero null space vector and arrange its coordinate magnitudes as . Assume . The Lq null space property rules out a nonzero null space vector supported on at most coordinates, so and . Since , the factors are at most for and at least for with . Terms with contribute zero and require no negative power of zero. ThusThe largest coordinates maximize the -power sum on any set of size at most . Its complement therefore has the smallest complementary -power sum. The displayed strict inequality proves the Lq null space property at exponent for every allowed support of a vector. The stated recovery characterization now applies to the Lq quasi-norm at .
If , the measurement constraint already singles out , for every objective; if , only the zero sparse vector needs recovery. These cases do not need a positive threshold. Uniform recovery at implies uniform recovery at every :
New to topics? Read the docs here!